U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to restrict travel from most European countries to try to contain what he called a “foreign virus” isn’t grounded in science and breaks international law, experts say.
Trump announced the month-long travel ban earlier this week to restrict passenger arrivals from 26 European nations that he said “seeded” the virus.
Dr. Allison McGeer, an infectious disease consultant and microbiologist at Toronto’s Sinai Health Network, said the ban is not evidence-based.
“What the science tells you is that travel bans are not nearly effective as you think they might be,” McGeer said. “I think we really need to be focused on what we need to do to protect ourselves from community transmission in our countries as opposed to worrying about what happens when other people coming from other countries to us.”
Similarly, when asked whether the Canada-U.S. border might close to limit spread, McGeer said “probably not.”
“There’s a bit of a temptation to say now that because we have so many fewer cases in Canada than some places in the United States that we might worry about travellers from the United States,” she said. “That kind of restriction might delay our outbreak by a week … and the damage that it does is probably just not worth that week’s delay.”
Travel bans also risk discouraging people from disclosing where they’ve previously visited.
Officially, the World Health Organization says that denying entry to passengers arriving from affected countries are “usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have significant economic and social impact.”
What’s more, there are disadvantages to travel bans, said Steven Hoffman, a professor of global health law and political science at York University who uses legal and public health expertise to advise governments on pandemics.
“They don’t work,” Hoffman said. “They undermine the public health response. They undermine trust in governments and violate international law in the process.”
The reason travel bans and restrictions don’t work, he said, is that if people want to travel, they’ll find ways to do so. Instead it’s best if people travel through “official channels” that can be monitored and made safer by identifying cases and their close contacts.
The Public Health Agency of Canada now asks travellers from China, Iran and Italy to contact the public health authority in the province or territory where they live or stay within 24 hours of arrival. Travellers are also asked to watch for fever, cough, or difficulty breathing. If so, they should call ahead to provincial health authorities.
“Viruses don’t carry passports. They don’t respect border officials,” Hoffman said. “They certainly don’t prefer one country’s citizens over another.”
The European Union’s governing body objected to the U.S. ban, saying “the coronavirus is a global crisis, not limited to any continent and it requires co-operation rather than unilateral action.”
Dan Werb is assistant professor of epidemiology at the University of California San Diego and the University of Toronto who studies health policy and communications.
Werb said the side-effects of epidemics go far beyond the pathogens that are driving them. The role of governments therefore is to restore confidence and quell panic.
“We know that panic is a common response to epidemics,” Werb said. “The kinds of moves being made by the Trump administration are just essentially doing the opposite of what they should be doing.”
Several modelling studies have looked at how effective Wuhan’s lockdown was. The conclusion? It likely delayed the spread of the virus to other parts of China by around three days.
Canada is earlier in its outbreak than some other countries, including China and the U.S.
“The key is that Canada needs to maintain its current evidence-based approach to outbreak response and not take any knee-jerk reactions that might be motivated by other considerations, which admittedly I understand it’s hard for political leaders to do,” Hoffman said.
If the epidemic worsens, Canadians might see public health authorities ask people to voluntarily reconsider gathering with large groups.
For now, Canadian health officials are asking all segments of society to prepare by:
- Taking stock if meetings and conferences could happen virtually instead of in person, or be delayed.
- Asking school boards to develop contingency plans in case of a local outbreak in the community.
- Considering whether events should be cancelled if things get worse.
Otherwise, the advice to stay home when sick, wash hands often and give handshake alternatives like elbow bumps still stands.
View original article here Source